Digital identity remains one of the most challenging issues to address in the evolving Web3 ecosystem. With the proliferation of blockchain technology, two new concepts have emerged as potential solutions: Soulbound Tokens (SBTs) and Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). In this blog post, we'll compare and contrast these two approaches to understand their potential implications for the future of digital identity.
Soulbound Tokens: A New Take on Digital Identity
Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and his colleagues recently introduced the concept of Soulbound Tokens as a new approach to digital identity. According to a report by Fraser Edwards on Cryptonews (1), SBTs are non-transferable fungible tokens that are issued from one individual to another and cannot be traded with others. Once an SBT is obtained, it is permanently tied to the recipient.
SBTs can be thought of as digital scout badges that represent various credentials or achievements, from a driver's license to a concert ticket. However, SBTs come with potential privacy risks, as they are publicly recorded on the blockchain by default1.
Self-Sovereign Identity: A User-Centric Approach
Self-Sovereign Identity, on the other hand, offers a user-centric model for digital identity management. SSI provides users with control over their personal information by allowing them to securely hold and share their data only with trusted parties when necessary(1).
SSI's private and off-ledger nature contrasts sharply with the public and on-ledger nature of SBTs. By giving users more control over their personal information, SSI may provide a more secure and privacy-focused solution for digital identity.
SBTs vs. SSI: A Privacy Perspective
SBTs and SSI are both intriguing approaches to digital identity in Web3, but they differ significantly in their privacy implications.
SBTs leverage the familiar concept of NFTs, making them attractive for adoption within the Web3 community. However, the public nature of SBTs raises concerns about privacy, traceability, and the potential for misuse of digital identities1.
SSI addresses digital identity issues with a privacy-focused approach, giving users control over their data and how it is shared1. Although SSI may lack the immediate familiarity of SBTs, its emphasis on user control and data ownership makes it a more sustainable solution for digital identity management.
Conclusion
The Web3 ecosystem continues to explore digital identity solutions, and both Soulbound Tokens and Self-Sovereign Identity offer promising approaches. SBTs benefit from their resemblance to NFTs, but their public nature raises significant privacy concerns. SSI, on the other hand, emphasizes user control and privacy, making it a more comprehensive solution for digital identity in Web3.
As Web3 evolves, prioritizing digital identity solutions that empower individuals to control their own identities while ensuring privacy and security is crucial. SSI's user-centric approach positions it as a more viable option for creating a truly decentralized and user-controlled digital identity ecosystem in Web3.
Footnotes
Source: Fraser Edwards, "Soulbound Tokens vs Self-Sovereign Identity: Web3’s Search for a Digital ID Solution", Cryptonews, Aug 28, 2022, link
Opmerkingen